The Chi-Square Statistic  
G & W Chapter 17  

I. Parametric vs. Non-parametric Statistics

A. Sample vs. Population  

        Remember statistic vs. parameter?

B. Parametric

1. distribution assumptions   parametric assumption notes

2. data requirements

C. Non-parametric

  II. Chi-square: Test for Goodness-of-Fit

(How well do the proportions for a sample distribution fit the corresponding population proportions?)

**Analogous to which parametric test?

A. Null Hypothesis -

1. : no preference in population/ equally divided

: population is NOT equally divided among the categories

2. : no difference from a comparison—where a specific population distribution is already known

* : population distribution is NOT shaped the same as the population specified above in

B. Calculating Chi-square

1. observed frequencies,

2. expected frequencies,

3.

C. Looking up chi-square ( table of critical values)

1. df = # of categories - 1

2. alpha level, generally in psychology we use

3. the chi-square distribution

4. Table B.8 (G&W p. 737)

D. Make a decision about  

 

Figure 17-2  (p. 584)
Chi-square distributions are positively skewed. The critical region is placed in the extreme tail, which reflects large chi-square values.

 

Figure 17-3  (p. 585)
The shape of the chi-square distribution for different values of df. As the number of categories increases, the peak (mode) of the distribution has a larger chi-square value.

 

E.  Examples

 

 

III. Chi-square: Test for Independence

(Is there a relationship between two variables?)

(Is the distribution across categories the same for all treatment groups?)

**Analogous to which 2 parametric tests?
 

A. Null Hypothesis

: distribution of responses across response categories is the same for all treatment groups

* : distribution of responses across response categories is NOT the same for all treatment groups

 

B. Calculating Chi-square

1. What are the observed frequencies?

2. Calculate expected frequencies (if Ho is indeed true)

3.

C. Looking up chi-square (critical value)

1.

2. Table B.8 (G&W p. 737)

       D. Make a decision about  

 

 

 

 

Table 17-8  (p. 596)
A frequency distribution showing the level of self-esteem according to the level of academic performance for a sample of n = 150 ten-year-old children.

 

E. Assumptions and Restrictions for Chi-Square Tests

     Each observation is independent

 

 

    Expected frequency of each cell must be at least 5

 

 

IV.  Effect Size

Remember that test statistics are influenced by size of the treatment effect and size of the sample(s). If enough participants are used, even the smallest effect can generate a significant test statistic. As a result, we calculated eta squared for treatment effects in ANOVA. Here are some options for the chi-square test for independence.

 

 

 

 

A. Phi Coefficient ( ø)

Measures the strength of the relationship between the two variables for a 2 x 2 matrix.

 

 

    Interpreting ø

    .10 is a small effect

    .30 is a medium effect

    .50 is a large effect

 

ø2 represents the percentage of variance accounted for (like r2)

 

 

B. Cramér’s V 

 

A modification of the phi coefficient. Measures the strength of the relationship between the two variables in a matrix larger than 2 x 2.

 

Calculated like ø, except that df* is also represented in the denominator

 

df* is the smaller of either (R-1) or (C-1)

 

 

 

Table 17-11  (p. 606)
Standards for interpreting Cramér’s V as proposed by Cohen (1988)